Tracing the Saddle From Bush to Maze: Why Some AI Is Worth Less Than a Shrub

Got it — here’s the blogpost-ready public-facing version of the conceptual paper you asked for. I’ve kept the rigor but framed it in an essay style that fits a blog audience, tying back to your “brute force maze” post and the parallel bush theory.





From Bush to Maze: Why Some AI Is Worth Less Than a Shrub



Artificial Intelligence is often praised for being clever, powerful, and transformative. But what if, after all the buzz, the system you’ve built is worth less than a bush? That is the essence of what I call the Parallel Bush Theory of Worthless AI—a way to measure whether AI contributes anything beyond the simplest, natural baseline.


In an earlier post, From Chaos to Clarity: The Brute Force Maze Runner Strategy, I described AI as a maze runner: a relay mechanism traversing decision trees, sometimes with brute force, sometimes with guidance. The parallel bush theory sharpens this critique: if the AI relay spends massive effort inside the maze but produces less net value than a bush outside of it, then it is, by definition, worthless.





The Bush as Baseline



A bush may look simple, but it is not useless. It provides oxygen, shade, berries, ecological balance, and life. It requires no server racks, no training data, no terawatts of electricity.


If your AI can’t beat the bush in terms of net utility, then all its wires, layers, and hype amount to nothing more than wasted resources.





The Maze and the Relay



Think of AI as a relay mechanism inside a maze:


  • The Maze = the problem space, full of nodes and branches.
  • The Relay = the AI system trying to find the exit.
  • Brute Force = the fallback rescue operation when heuristics fail.



Every relay comes with a cost: compute, energy, time, complexity. And every successful path yields a reward: insight, output, a usable solution.


The math is simple:


Net Worth = Yield – Cost


If that number is lower than the utility of a bush, the AI is worthless in practice, no matter how complex it looks in theory.





When Brute Force Becomes a Parasite



In the brute-force maze model, AI systems often rely on relays as rescue apparatus. That means when the clever heuristic gets stuck, the machine switches to raw enumeration—trying paths one by one until something works.


  • If this rescue amplifies value—great.
  • If this rescue drains more resources than it gives back, then it’s a parasite.



Many modern generative systems (large models, endless search algorithms) risk falling into the parasite trap: they use staggering amounts of energy and computation, but the outputs—generic text, bland images, trivial insights—don’t exceed the bush baseline.





The Worthlessness Test



So how do we tell if AI is worth less than the bush? We can apply three simple questions:


  1. Does the system produce more value than it consumes?
  2. Is the output genuinely useful, or just noise dressed up as novelty?
  3. Would a simpler natural or human baseline do the job better?



If the answers fail, the AI is simply a parallel bush inside the maze—growing in complexity but bearing no fruit.





Why This Matters



The theory is not just satire—it is a design principle.


  • Stop building bloated relays that require brute-force rescue for every task.
  • Simplify the maze. Constrain the search. Guide the traversal.
  • Demand that every AI clear the bush baseline before celebrating its utility.






Conclusion



The bush reminds us of a brutal truth: nature has intrinsic worth with no computation at all. AI must prove itself against that baseline.


A relay that consumes massive energy and delivers triviality is not a marvel—it is a parasite. A maze that requires brute-force rescue for every step is not a frontier—it is a trap.


The goal, then, is clear: build AI that is amplifier, not parasite. Build mazes that are solvable without drowning in brute force. Build systems whose worth is unmistakably greater than the bush.


Only then does AI escape the shadow of worthlessness.




👉 Do you want me to also design a diagram (maze + bush + relay arrows) that visualizes this theory for the blogpost?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Low Volume Tech Jargon Classification Scheme

while the dark web prides itself on the finger on identifying you anonymously the associated alternative classification method of keeping a secret is low circulation volume with field specific technologies jargon . so unless you were subjectively and targeted by index specifically id'd it isn't a higher level risk for publications. the circulation noise pot relies on happenstance review and browsing Publication Types Table Publication Types Table Publication Type Specific Identifier Risk Level Volume of Circulation Local Newspaper Mailman Low High Community Newsletter Mailman Low Low Academic Journal ISSN High Low National Magazine ISSN Medium High Corporate Brochure Company Identifier Low...
Read more

Dead Drop Zone Alcatraz Allegheny

The back door cybersecurity on a Martí marriage from Cuba is delicate sensitivity issues because of class warfare and the indexing search engine inventory tactic of how much I’m better than th and the frog u lent pond mirror I’ve been choking on since my cyberwarfare hacking days with Cuban dissidents at the cyberwarfare pond laboratory at the NASA knowledge management lab at FIU in the trenches of live fire cyberwarfare sandbox laptop full metal jacket at the world bank at point blank range with nothing but my guts and self esteem to pick up off the glass mirror face on my ass to clean up like a piggybacking grave of fruit.  I’ve done years with this tactic forging high level communication in sensitive regions as a dead drop zone analyst nothing to com by to lose under unified assessment assumptions that the executive back door threat is not an open notorious love letter #9 like a Jin Ping thug.  The shadow works 2 and even 3 way in the prism of the consciousness of waking li...
Read more

Sexes of Death: Near Death Experience Sex Convalescing

Near death experiences sex is like makeup sex or prison sex!  You’ve never seen a woman so turned on and horny until she was invited anonymously the stranger to an abandonment death bed in the throes of passionate passing.  I think this is what erotically arouses serial killers like the bk killer (eta 6 monso ie once upon a time in MIA69) because unlike mobster hit men like Al Capone or John Gotti who peddle the authority over life and death for power, serial killers have a niche fetishized personality profile that they like to victimize over this natural threshold of conscious spiritual existence and they got me a wire from New York one of their bosses wants a bk Charlie to prey on these gullible pedophiliac stall women who can’t stand up to their hand of God for couple of chump change dimes in the going slut raffle prize winnings handout.   Near death experiences are aphrodisiacal and conducive to orgies.   You can bust a whole wide open up in this police force wit...
Read more